[Averex15]

I don't know if its jus me or what, but I find 2p games to get a little boring. I think 3/4/5 players games take more talent because creating a strategy isnt as easy to make as it is in an 2 player game. I've only been playing for like 3 weeks ..so I know I'm fairly new to the game but I pretty much fully understand everything. I just wanna everyones opinion

[Jinn]

I do not play two or three player games. I play on four or five.

I want as much competition and challenge as possible.
_________________
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be

[trace567]

3 player in my opinion is the hardest, as you don't have more players to bid if your cash is low and prices can vary dramatically.

2 player requires more concentration as trading to get out of a ditch is pretty impossible.

4 player requires adaptability of strategy as your idea's may not work with others in that game.

5 player requires a greater trading art, as more players to block your sets.

[jmf81]

I agree 3 player is hardest. I prefer the challenge of 4 or 5 player games

[MATTIE]

i play 2p if i want points ( i win 75% of my games ) and 45p when i want some fun simple as that. And 3p not so much , in fact i am a novice in it ...

[theunknownamus]

I actually pefer 3 player the best. I win most of them (80%) or at least come in 2nd. My general strategy is to land on a property and let the other 2 players squabble and bid like crazy over it and I reap the rewards. After the "good" decoy properties are taken and the other 2 are low in cash, I buy the actual good one's with high cash and little competition. Not to mention, I can easily buy upgrades.