[judd]

ok

this is getitng annoying

lets have a comunity opinion on the following:

does yahoo do anything constructive for the comunity or does he try to fragment it and cause internal bickering

[aussie]

he is annoying
_________________
why try so hard to fit in ....when you were born to stand out

[ingeras]

Agree very annoying.
_________________
CARPE DIEM....

Our greatest glory is not in never falling,but in rising every time we fall...(Confucius)

[trace567]

Beyond annoying.

[Yiles]

He's a troll, nothing less.


If you feed him attention by even acknowledging him, he will just keep posting nonsense.

Therefore, I suggest you do like I do, and ignore ANYTHING he says.


To me, he's not even a real GM entity here- I stopped reading his posts long ago
_________________

[trace567]

For god sake yaaahoooo, read the damn post I made first of all on the subject. It tells you how many games, and what months we are talking of.

So go read, get ya fact right.

[Yiles]

That's just it, Trace- "the troll" doesn't have to "get his facts right" or even be logical to serve his purpose of stirring up stuff and being an idiot-

Therefore I suggest everyone just ignore him and save yourselves the stress- it's clear all he wants is attention, so don't give it to him
_________________

[MATTIE]

really really really annoying , i think if more than 80 % agree that he is , there should be a forum ban on this guy.

[diron]

really really really very very very annoying .
Ban him from the forum please!

[trace567]

Situation has been resolved.

[theunknownamus]

(All my strength, haste thee to help me) Now, I know Yahoo (sorry spelling) has been negative frequently, but he has made some vaild points. However, his references are shaky. I consider him to be the "Wikipedia" of posting. Full of conspiracy theories with wavering vaildity and some being plasuible. I had read a lot of his posts and they're about half and half positive (advice, information, ideas) and negative (undermining Mods and Admins, rejecting ideas quickly, arguing with people). Forgive me if I can't remember every one of the posts and subjects as they are lengthy. Look at topics from about October 12, 2009 and on. I understand his skepticism about certain things, although he often goes to extremes. Overall I'd say he is about 55% helpful and 45% argumenative.

I understand how people can be annoyed but I don't believe he should be banned. This makes us look a bit like a Dictatorship who ignores the 1st amendment (Freedom of Speech and Press) censoring anything that is negative. If his ban isn't lifted, we'll look like hyprocrites who can say whatever we want but others cannot. For Pete's sake, look at Bill Mauer, Jon Stewart, and all of CNN news to name a few sickeningly biased, stacked cards, media producers.

I know we are all trying to make GM a better place and critisim hurts sometimes, but you can look at it and learn from it. If it is unjust critisim, just ignore it. I deal with pessimists all the time, many not as smart as YAAAHOOOO. I simply ignore them and don't let it affect me. If it really bothers people, just ignore his replies and post on only talking about the topic at hand. But if they are valid, at least spend time thinking on them about their reasonableness.

God protect me from bashing...

[jmf81]

Have added my vote-very annoying

[Jinn]

Should be a null option.

Personally I find his behavior rather humorous.

It is easy to spot an attention whore and a lot of fun to watch as they travel down the spiral.

In a way it is sad and I feel for them, we should strive to help people like yahoo but when a person refuses to help themselves its just time to get the popcorn and watch the show.
_________________
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be

[theunknownamus]

Wow. I'm not sure what to say after this spectacle.

[Yiles]