[kingfisher]

its a 4p game battle , zevs , creative and dealmaster start is 115+ 2browns +400 for 1 green
by mistake i give him nd i told him its a mistake plz return me back but he didn't back nd he upgrade browns he told me thats not my fault. i told him by mistake i give u but he didn'nt return me

and 2 nd complaint for Zevas and dealmaster

start is -360

dealmaster offer to zevas

dealmaster want 1000 for 3rd red and zevas accept the offer

but zevas already in 1st position and he have 6000+ cash

he help dealmaster and give him 1000

i told to zevas this is not fair trade he told me i want red

but he did'nt uprade the reds

he want to help deal thats y he accept the offer

becoz of this

i loose this game nd loose -3800 points

[CANON]

Firstly, if someone sends a trade 'by mistake'... that is his/her problem and cannot demand that the acceptor reverse the trade. Seems fair one to me anyway.

Secondly, with regard to the red sold at 1000 when EC is at -360. This seems equally beneficial to both players and this is not dealmaster's issue that zevs didnt upgrade. If he/she had then maybe it would have ended diferently, but as far as I can see it seems pretty fair enough all-round.

No action taken.

[trace567]

Having looked at the trade quickly, I completely agree with Cannon. Positions in the game were not concrete as there wasn't enough cash difference between the leading 2 players to be certain. The value traded under the situation seems fair and beneficial to both.

[andreja]

I'm glad you agree on me (zevs)
i wanted the red one because of its credit and in case of need to upgrade it, not to save the dealmaster, cause i play fair